Leader of the All Progressives Congress (APC) caucus in the House of
Representatives, Femi Gbajabiamila, has said that irrespective of the
nomenclature given to the act of budget-padding, the National Assembly
will continue to pad the budget for certain reasons.
Gbajabiamila,
who initially claimed not to understand what budget-padding means,
explained that lawmakers, even in the most advanced democracies of the
world, pad the budget to be able to generate extra money for providing
democracy dividends to their respective constituencies especially when
their constituencies are not captured in the national budget.
The lawmaker disclosed this during an interview on Channels TV that was anchored by Seun Okinbaloye and monitored by DAILY POST.
He
said that it was legislative malpractice for a lawmaker to sit back and
do nothing when a national budget that does not make provisions for his
constituency is been appropriated.
The Majority Leader said that
in some advanced countries, budget- padding is not only practiced but
called ‘earmarking’ or ‘pump-up legislation.’
He said that since
the National Assembly holds the power to the national treasury, it will
continue to scrutinize the level of budget-padding from the executive,
stressing that it’s not a rubber stamp.
Gbajabiamila said that
since suspended Rep. Abdulmumuni Jibrin decided to take the issue of
legislative budget padding to the law enforcement agencies, it was
proper for the House to sit back and let them do whatever they want to
do, adding that there was no regret over suspension of Jibrin, if indeed
he was a true whistle-blower like he claimed to be.
He said:
“Abdulmumuni Jibrin did what he needed to do. He took the matter to the
law enforcement agencies – the EFCC, the police and the rest of them. He
has done his. The National Assembly does not agree with it. He put the
ball in the court of the law enforcement agents. It is up to them to do
whatever they want to do. I’m not aware of any padding. I don’t
understand what that means.
“When it comes to money and I
represent a particular constituency but I look at the budget and I don’t
see my constituency represented in that budget and I know that
throughout the year people of my constituency have needs – they want
this; they want that. It is only me they can talk to. They are not going
to talk to the President.
“I actually consider it as malpractice
not padding, if during the budget circle I have opportunity to attract
something to my constituency and I sit back and do nothing and go back
in four years to seek for their mandate again when I promised them all
these years that I will do this and do that. What do I go back and tell
them? ‘Oh, I am not allowed to pad the budget.’
“If for instance,
I represent a constituency and a budget is sent to National Assembly.
It is one of the most important pieces of legislation to come out of the
National Assembly. By my representation, I should attract federal
presence to my constituency.
“Even in the most advanced of
democracies, you have heard of earmarks, you have heard of pumped-up
legislation. It is the same thing. It is done everywhere in the world
otherwise you are not worth the sit you seat on.
“Let me explain
something to you about padding. That’s what Nigerians need to
understand. It doesn’t mean that if you hear anything thing negative
about the National Assembly and you are not objective. You will not
understand what is going on.
“In terms of padding from the
executive, there are checks and balances. That’s why we have always
argued that the National Assembly is not a rubber stamp. It is trite
that the legislature holds the power of the purse. We will go through
this budget and look at it item for item; item by item. Whatever padding
means, I don’t know.”
Daily Post Nigeria.
Nigerian Daily Mail gives you daily update on news and entertainment in Nigeria and the foreign scene.
Home_ads
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Share your opinion